Skip to content


QRO vs. QRM

QRO vs. QRMIt’s come to my attention that a few simpletons in our hobby believe that high power stations (QRO) are somehow worse than QRM.  Some of these “little pistols” (they call themselves) believe “big gun” (high power, high gain antenna) guys have some sort of unfair advantage, and on more than a few occasions have cost little pistols some QSO’s.  They say these QRO guys and their big stations are bad for the hobby.  QRO stations are examples of what’s not needed (or wanted) in our great hobby.

I think it’s kinda’ creepy they think this way.

My thoughts are a high power station’s odds of working that rare DX station in a pile-up are much better than some low power station.  A QRO station that does have a clue in what he (or she) is doing, well, they’re in and out of most DX pile-ups rather quickly.  One and done.  Sometimes in seconds.  A little anti-climatic, but nonetheless – it’s over.  Free to go cut the grass.  Change the oil in the car.  Go for a ride on the motorcycle.  They’re surely not cluttering up the airwaves or taking up bandwidth, right?  Through years, even decades in this hobby you assemble knowledge and you build a station capable of hearing (and being heard), and now you’re expected to step aside for some little pistol because he’s been calling for hours?  He’s “entitled” to a QSO because he’s a little pistol?  Bwahahahahaha, now that’s  funny!

Ham Radio QRO vs. QRMAnd while Mr. QRO is out to dinner with his wife, the low power G5RV guys are still calling, and calling, and calling, and calling, and bitching, and complaining on forums and chat boards – hours, sometimes even days later.  I’ve also know a few of these QRO complaining clowns that after hours and hours of calling, they never did work the DX station, but they feel if you called enough times and sent $5 USD then that counts for a legitimate QSO.  I did not know that was considered a Ham Radio two-way contact!

So who is really the QRM?  The QRO guy that’s in and out, or the little pistol guy that incessantly calls for hours, days, maybe even weeks?  Even when they forget they’re operating split once every 10 or 20 calls, that’s still 100 times too many to call on the DX transmit frequency.

Seems to me these QRO complaining Lids have got their panty’s in a twist – over nothing.

There’s room in this hobby for everybody.  QRP, QRO, and everything in between.  But when you start throwing your opinion around, remember others have opinions too.  It works both ways, just as a real two-way QSO should, QSL?

Life’s too short for QRP.

Posted in N0UN Blog Posts.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , .


2 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Steve Wiggins says

    Excellent! I got my ticket in 1973. Operated until 1978. Started up again in 2014. It took me a couple of years to build my station… The last item on the equipment list was the amplifier. It changed my life! It waited, saved my money…. Built my tower and beam… That was great. But I got this amplifier, not the most powerful out there, and it changed my life. These folks need to get a grip. Everything in life is competitive. And if you want to move to a higher position on the heap… Quit complaining and do something about it.

  2. Mike KJ4Z says

    I have heard a lot of complaining about the “greenie hunters” but I don’t recall hearing much griping about anyone running the legal limit. Where do these moaners congregate?

    After 23 years on the air, I finally picked up an Acom 1500 this spring but I’ve never even plugged it in. I was going to have to get 220 volt service installed to my shack in a 100 year old rental house with plaster walls and an anxious landlady and it started to just seem like more trouble than it was worth. Especially in the close confines of a suburban neighborhood. For those who enjoy QRO, great. I think I’ll stick to my QRPp KPA-500 for now. The neighbors probably hear me on their fillings already but they’ve been too polite to say so.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.